Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:59:15 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:

In article <5taq92tehljs2c9g0nu5egccv89dou2dt9@4ax.com>, newskat@katxyzkave.net says...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:18:48 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your
Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

http://www.physics911.net/

http://www.physics911.net/stevenjones.htm

I think theses pages take you to a serious presentation for inquiry

Why not try a site that has REAL facts, www.911myths.com ?

Well, actually both sites make good presentation of their information.

Either one view is right and the other is wrong.

I would still go for the official story being a whitewash and for there
being too many inconsistancies in information to support this story.

Also government agencies do lie, when it suits them.

Harvey

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the absolute
lack of evidence to support it.



Widdershins

I prefer the wicked rather than the foolish.  
The wicked sometimes rest.

Alexandre Dumas, pere (with thanks to Twitch)