In article <g4bs92d2sdv7u4n33ncj2bovj4m8udobkb@4ax.com>, sinistre@liripipe.com says...

Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:59:15 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:

In article <5taq92tehljs2c9g0nu5egccv89dou2dt9@4ax.com>, newskat@katxyzkave.net says...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:18:48 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your
Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

http://www.physics911.net/

http://www.physics911.net/stevenjones.htm

I think theses pages take you to a serious presentation for inquiry

Why not try a site that has REAL facts, www.911myths.com ?

Well, actually both sites make good presentation of their information.

Either one view is right and the other is wrong.

I would still go for the official story being a whitewash and for there
being too many inconsistancies in information to support this story.

Also government agencies do lie, when it suits them.

Harvey

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the absolute
lack of evidence to support it.



Widdershins

I prefer the wicked rather than the foolish.  
The wicked sometimes rest.

Alexandre Dumas, pere (with thanks to Twitch)

Oh yeah, believe everyone at their face value, no one is lying...

The last pope was a Saint, President Bush is squeaky clean,
Clinton never lied, Nixon was framed, Oliver North is a hero...

Harvey