In news:mpls92h8188a3s8h3l7b7o1kqb34etaofr@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
...the WTC were demolished with thousands of pounds of thermite, a
B-25 Mitchell is the equivalent of a Boeing 767, a building crumbling
from the top down looks just like a controlled demolition, steel
doesn't get weaker when heated, Mossad obviously demolished the WTC at
the direction of GWB, posting untrue things makes other things
untrue...

What were Al Queda's motives for the 9/11 attacks?

I don't think it takes a genius to realise what the consequences of
attacking a Superpower are going to be, the result has been very
predictable. So unless they wanted the US to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and
kill thousands of Arabs, and consolidate the position of Israel, which is
very unlikely since it would appear to be against everything Al Queda
actually stand for I can't honestly see a motive.

One can have all the circumstantial and hearsay evidence in the World.
However without a clear and plausible motive it is worth Jack Shit.
-- 
Amanda