Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: John Griffin
Date: 25/06/2006, 18:33
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:g4bs92d2sdv7u4n33ncj2bovj4m8udobkb@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the
absolute lack of evidence to support it.

Well actually no...

Well...actually yes it is, in the case at hand and in most others.

In a murder trial you need both a motive, and evidence (i.e. a
body) You can have all the evidence in the World, but if this
doesn't support a sensible and plausible motive it is worth
absolutely Jack Shit. 

Speaking of evidence...as usual, you're operating in a total clue-
vacuum.

I think that is the fundamental problem with the official
story of 9/11. Why would a Al Queda want to attack the US,
knowing full well what the consequences are likely to be and
the fact that they could not possibly win against a
Superpower? Problem is there doesn't appear to be any logical 
explanation. or Motive for an Al Queda attack. What did they
expect to Achieve?

Duh.  Seventy-two virgins, for one thing.  You seem to have 
forgotten that the perpetrators were drones of The Pervert 
Mohammed's zombie army.  The stupid bastards actually think they're 
avenging some crimes against the pervert's cult, e.g., a modern 
human left a footprint on land those savages claim as cult 
property.  Islam is a form of insanity. It doesn't operate on 
logic.

OTOH you can come up with logical reasons why the US might
want to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. You can arrive at logical
reasons why the Israelies might want to manipulate the US into
a war against Islam. 

You can describe an elephant flapping its ears and flying.

There are a variety of possible motives, but none of them
appear to point to Al Queda. Unless they were hoping the US
would blame Mossad and attack Israel.

Holy shit.  You're earning some major sympathy here. It's almost as 
though you have an inoperable tumor on an inoperable brain.

So whilst there appears to be evidence, it doesn't count for
much without a realistic and plausible motive.

That will take it's place somewhere in the top 25% of the dumbest 
things you've said so far.