you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

In article <g4bs92d2sdv7u4n33ncj2bovj4m8udobkb@4ax.com>,
sinistre@liripipe.com says... 

Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:59:15 +0000 (UTC),
you@somehost.somedomain.aus 
(Your Name Here=Harvey) licked the point of a #2 Yellow
Pencil, and wrote:

In article <5taq92tehljs2c9g0nu5egccv89dou2dt9@4ax.com>,
newskat@katxyzkave.net says... 

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:18:48 +0000 (UTC),
you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

http://www.physics911.net/

http://www.physics911.net/stevenjones.htm

I think theses pages take you to a serious presentation for
inquiry 

Why not try a site that has REAL facts, www.911myths.com ?

Well, actually both sites make good presentation of their
information. 

Either one view is right and the other is wrong.

I would still go for the official story being a whitewash and
for there being too many inconsistancies in information to
support this story. 

Also government agencies do lie, when it suits them.

Harvey

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the
absolute lack of evidence to support it.



Widdershins

I prefer the wicked rather than the foolish.  
The wicked sometimes rest.

Alexandre Dumas, pere (with thanks to Twitch)

Oh yeah, believe everyone at their face value, no one is
lying... 

The last pope was a Saint, President Bush is squeaky clean,
Clinton never lied, Nixon was framed, Oliver North is a
hero... 

...Harvey gets it...

Harvey