"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:mpls92h8188a3s8h3l7b7o1kqb34etaofr@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC),
you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
...the WTC were demolished with thousands of pounds of
thermite, a B-25 Mitchell is the equivalent of a Boeing 767,
a building crumbling from the top down looks just like a
controlled demolition, steel doesn't get weaker when heated,
Mossad obviously demolished the WTC at the direction of GWB,
posting untrue things makes other things untrue...

What were Al Queda's motives for the 9/11 attacks?

I don't think it takes a genius to realise what the
consequences of attacking a Superpower are going to be, the
result has been very predictable. So unless they wanted the US
to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and kill thousands of Arabs,
and consolidate the position of Israel, which is very unlikely
since it would appear to be against everything Al Queda 
actually stand for I can't honestly see a motive. 

If that's true, you couldn't honestly see a motive for a cold 
drink of water on a blistering hot day.  It becomes more and more 
obvious that understanding simple stuff is a job way above your 
pay grade.
 

One can have all the circumstantial and hearsay evidence in
the World. However without a clear and plausible motive it is
worth Jack Shit. 

That reminds me of the time you said you aren't stupid.

Do you think North Korea will nuke someone?  

If yes, do you understand that it will be because that crazy 
sumbitch dictator is completely out of his fuckin' mind?  The 
possibility that his country might soon thereafter be a 
protectorate of Japan won't deter him.  His mind is fucked up 
because of his own problems.  Mohammedans' minds are equally 
fucked up, because their savage cult wants it that way.  That's 
their motive.