In article <sPvng.46758$qD.11600@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>, manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:g4bs92d2sdv7u4n33ncj2bovj4m8udobkb@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the absolute
lack of evidence to support it.

Well actually no...
In a murder trial you need both a motive, and evidence (i.e. a body) You can
have all the evidence in the World, but if this doesn't support a sensible
and plausible motive it is worth absolutely Jack Shit.

I think that is the fundamental problem with the official story of 9/11. Why
would a Al Queda want to attack the US, knowing full well what the
consequences are likely to be and the fact that they could not possibly win
against a Superpower? Problem is there doesn't appear to be any logical
explanation. or Motive for an Al Queda attack. What did they expect to
Achieve?

OTOH you can come up with logical reasons why the US might want to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq. You can arrive at logical reasons why the Israelies
might want to manipulate the US into a war against Islam.

There are a variety of possible motives, but none of them appear to point to
Al Queda. Unless they were hoping the US would blame Mossad and attack
Israel.

So whilst there appears to be evidence, it doesn't count for much without a
realistic and plausible motive.

-- 
Amanda

This will probably be answered by someone who's been tracking the
information background to all this, bringing up all sorts of information
not mentioned in the mass media.

Oh, the CIA did bankroll Bin Laden in his earlier days, helping the US
at some point.
That the connection seems to be with oil, oil reserves and oil pipelines
(Afghanistan being in a position whereby an important oil pipeline can
 be routed through that country).

I think everyone would agree that Desert Storm would not have occurred
if oil was not present, and was the prime factor, why the US would show
any interest with defending Kuwait.

If you were to review Bin Laden's terrorist attacks prior to 9-11, you
can see they were all small scale attacks, and when you look at the
whole 9-11 picture, this shows it is far too big, and far too well planned
to have been engineered by Bin Laden. ie. it is beyond his resources, which
are small scale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden

The September 11, 2001 Attacks
 
Taken from the 12/27/2001 Osama bin Laden video.Immediately after 
the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, the United States 
government named bin Laden as the prime suspect. However, Osama denied 
responsibility for the attacks, and in an interview for the Karachi-based 
Pakistani daily newspaper Ummat, published on September 28, 2001, 
he stated:

    I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks 
in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. 
I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of 
innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. 
Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other 
people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. [...] 
The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks 
within itself [...] there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped 
groups capable of causing such large-scale destruction.     


Harvey