On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:47:37 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

In article <sPvng.46758$qD.11600@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>, manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:g4bs92d2sdv7u4n33ncj2bovj4m8udobkb@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:

Keep in mind; the best evidence for a conspiracy is the absolute
lack of evidence to support it.

Well actually no...
In a murder trial you need both a motive, and evidence (i.e. a body) You can
have all the evidence in the World, but if this doesn't support a sensible
and plausible motive it is worth absolutely Jack Shit.

I think that is the fundamental problem with the official story of 9/11. Why
would a Al Queda want to attack the US, knowing full well what the
consequences are likely to be and the fact that they could not possibly win
against a Superpower? Problem is there doesn't appear to be any logical
explanation. or Motive for an Al Queda attack. What did they expect to
Achieve?

OTOH you can come up with logical reasons why the US might want to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq. You can arrive at logical reasons why the Israelies
might want to manipulate the US into a war against Islam.

There are a variety of possible motives, but none of them appear to point to
Al Queda. Unless they were hoping the US would blame Mossad and attack
Israel.

So whilst there appears to be evidence, it doesn't count for much without a
realistic and plausible motive.

-- 
Amanda

This will probably be answered by someone who's been tracking the
information background to all this, bringing up all sorts of information
not mentioned in the mass media.

Oh, the CIA did bankroll Bin Laden in his earlier days, helping the US
at some point.
That the connection seems to be with oil, oil reserves and oil pipelines
(Afghanistan being in a position whereby an important oil pipeline can
be routed through that country).

It wouldn't surprise me if the USA had lent aid to Bin Laden, beck
when he was busy fighting against the USSR in Afghanistan.  The USA
provided aid to a number of resistence groups in Afghanistan at that
time.  What of it?  

I think everyone would agree that Desert Storm would not have occurred
if oil was not present, and was the prime factor, why the US would show
any interest with defending Kuwait.

If there wasn't any oil there, the Middle East would be an ignored
backwater, as far as world politics went.  So what?  

If you were to review Bin Laden's terrorist attacks prior to 9-11, you
can see they were all small scale attacks, and when you look at the
whole 9-11 picture, this shows it is far too big, and far too well planned
to have been engineered by Bin Laden. ie. it is beyond his resources, which
are small scale.

Why do you assume that Bin Laden was the sole bankroller of 9/11?  It
has been established that Al Qaeda was involved in the '92 attack on
the WTC, so why wouldn't they try again?  

Please provide a detailed cost accounting of just how expensive the
9/11 attack was, along with an appreciation of the fiscal resources
avialable to Al-Qaeda, as evidence of your k'lame.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden

The September 11, 2001 Attacks

Taken from the 12/27/2001 Osama bin Laden video.Immediately after 
the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, the United States 
government named bin Laden as the prime suspect. However, Osama denied 
responsibility for the attacks, and in an interview for the Karachi-based 
Pakistani daily newspaper Ummat, published on September 28, 2001, 
he stated:

   I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks 
in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. 
I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of 
innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. 
Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other 
people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. [...] 
The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks 
within itself [...] there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped 
groups capable of causing such large-scale destruction.     

Ah, so he k'lamed that he doesn't lie, therefore you believe that
everything he said was the truth, eh?  

It remains that 19 al-Qaeda operatives were the hijackers of the 9/11
jetliners.  It wouldn't be surprising that ObL denied involvement,
given the horrible press his organization got, coupled with the fact
that he was on the run in the wake of the US's invasion of his
hidey-hole.  

Thus would a Capone deny ordering a St. Valentine's Day Massacre.  

ESL! 

-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?