| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Bookman |
| Date: 26/06/2006, 04:54 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:12:23 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:08:42 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:
tell us about the Montauk project and why you're posting to usenet,
bookman.deco
I'm posting to usenet for my own amusment, Alexa. IIRC, I've told
you that before. Has the tequila eroded your memory?
it's time to remember your handlers
Delusion noted.
it's time to remember....
Looks like I was right.
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:14:28 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:
In news:mpls92h8188a3s8h3l7b7o1kqb34etaofr@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
...the WTC were demolished with thousands of pounds of thermite, a
B-25 Mitchell is the equivalent of a Boeing 767, a building crumbling
from the top down looks just like a controlled demolition, steel
doesn't get weaker when heated, Mossad obviously demolished the WTC at
the direction of GWB, posting untrue things makes other things
untrue...
What were Al Queda's motives for the 9/11 attacks?
If Al Queda had no motive to attack, why did Al Queda members perform
the attack?
I don't think
That much has been made quite obvious. Or did you manage to get it
through your head that a B-25 Mitchell is not the equivalent of a
Boeing 767, Amanda?
it takes a genius to realise what the consequences of
attacking a Superpower are going to be, the result has been very
predictable. So unless they wanted the US to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and
kill thousands of Arabs, and consolidate the position of Israel, which is
very unlikely since it would appear to be against everything Al Queda
actually stand for I can't honestly see a motive.
One can have all the circumstantial and hearsay evidence in the World.
However without a clear and plausible motive it is worth Jack Shit.
Calling the evidence of 9/11 "circumstantial and hearsay evidence"
just serves to prove your ignorance and/or political biases.
HTH.
ESL!
--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?