Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com>
Date: 26/06/2006, 14:19
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

In news:8uju92dc1e75g1p46741ov12iko5fhpgdc@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:44:19 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:5bpr921hc46k98t30d82lv9rpjveiffdv5@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

Why? I'm not a politician I am not answerable to the people, I'm
answerable only to myself I needn't justify any belief or
conclusion I may make according to evidence presented. Everyone is
free to study the events of 9/11 and study the ideas for and
against the conspiracies for themselves.

And the people who actually understand the facts are free to laugh
at you and mock you for your silly ko0kspiracy beliefs, too.

They can if they like but they would be making fools of themselves.

Not when you make laughable k'lames, such as your foolish comparison
of a B-25 Mitchell to a Boeing 767.

You obviously missed the point. The point was planes do hit tall buildings
and that was a quantifiable risk when the WTC was built. Addmitedly the B25
that hit the Empire State Building in 1945 was a lot smaller than a Boing
767,  But that's totally irrelevent to the point that was being made. But
since you are being picky about it the B25 was capable of carrying 3000 to
4000lb of bombs and there were larger planes in service even in 1945.


Problem
is apart from maybe some people high up in government or people
working in intelligence most of us don't actually know all the facts
pertaining to the event of 9/11 we only know what we are told and
can pick up in the media, press and on the Internet, and can come to
what ever conclusion that seems plausible. This means no plausible
theory is any more valid than any other. And that of course includes
the official KoOkspiracy theory. LOL

The predominent analysis is built on the available facts, while the
ko0kspiracy theories that you believe in are built upon
misunderstanding and/or ignoring those facts, plus wild speculation
without evidence.

The fact that you cannot tell the difference puts you in the same
class as Biblical literalists who k'lame, because their
misunderstanding of scientific evidence and theory blinds them, that
the Earth is only thousands of years old.


My advice would be; Don't believe anything.

Spoken like a true paranoid.

You can't always trust politicians

Where politics has any
involvement one can rest assured the liars, hypocrites Scribes and
Pharisees will distort the "truth" to whatever end they choose.

Better that than ko0ks who disregard the facts if favor of their
paranoid ko0kspiracy theories.

What fact's?
-- Amanda