"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:8uju92dc1e75g1p46741ov12iko5fhpgdc@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:44:19 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:5bpr921hc46k98t30d82lv9rpjveiffdv5@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

Why? I'm not a politician I am not answerable to the
people, I'm answerable only to myself I needn't justify
any belief or conclusion I may make according to evidence
presented. Everyone is free to study the events of 9/11
and study the ideas for and against the conspiracies for
themselves. 

And the people who actually understand the facts are free
to laugh at you and mock you for your silly ko0kspiracy
beliefs, too. 

They can if they like but they would be making fools of
themselves. 

Not when you make laughable k'lames, such as your foolish
comparison of a B-25 Mitchell to a Boeing 767.

You obviously missed the point. The point was planes do hit
tall buildings and that was a quantifiable risk when the WTC
was built. Addmitedly the B25 that hit the Empire State
Building in 1945 was a lot smaller than a Boing 767,  But
that's totally irrelevent to the point that was being made.
But since you are being picky about it the B25 was capable of
carrying 3000 to 4000lb of bombs and there were larger planes
in service even in 1945. 

Problem
is apart from maybe some people high up in government or
people working in intelligence most of us don't actually
know all the facts pertaining to the event of 9/11 we only
know what we are told and can pick up in the media, press
and on the Internet, and can come to what ever conclusion
that seems plausible. This means no plausible theory is any
more valid than any other. And that of course includes the
official KoOkspiracy theory. LOL 

The predominent analysis is built on the available facts,
while the ko0kspiracy theories that you believe in are built
upon misunderstanding and/or ignoring those facts, plus wild
speculation without evidence.

The fact that you cannot tell the difference puts you in the
same class as Biblical literalists who k'lame, because their
misunderstanding of scientific evidence and theory blinds
them, that the Earth is only thousands of years old.

My advice would be; Don't believe anything.

Spoken like a true paranoid.

You can't always trust politicians

Where politics has any
involvement one can rest assured the liars, hypocrites
Scribes and Pharisees will distort the "truth" to whatever
end they choose. 

Better that than ko0ks who disregard the facts if favor of
their paranoid ko0kspiracy theories.

What fact's?

The answer to that question, once it has been cleaned up, would 
probably run to a few megabytes just to review what you've said 
here, and I'm sure there are plenty that you haven't ignored yet.

Here's one for you:  Heat and temperature are not the same thing.

Here's a corollary to that one: Softened steel will not carry as 
much load as it did before the hardened steel absorbed enough 
heat to soften it.  (Compare this, roughly, to male anatomy if 
you like.)

Here's another: The airplane that hit one of the towers still had 
over 100,000 pounds of fuel in its tanks when it hit.

Want another?:  The Titanic carried more than 100,000 pounds of 
fuel when it left port. Somewhere around 200 times that much.

How do you like this one? If the towers had been imploded by 
seeting off charges of any kind inside them, all of the fucking 
windows would have been sucked inside before the collapse.  (See 
the definition of implode if you don't believe that.)

There are more.  Thousands of them.