On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:58:27 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:51:02 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

Expecting a negative proof is a logical fallacy

Expecting you to back up your claims is a fallacy, because you're not
intellectually capable, aside from the fact you're dishonest as hell.  But
that's to be expected from you, loopy logistician.

Nice IKYABWAI, Alexa.  "Remote Viewing" is your k'lame, and you have
failed to back it up, repeatedly.  

ESL! 

-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?