"BornN2BS" <nirrad01@gmail.com> wrote:

John Griffin wrote:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:8uju92dc1e75g1p46741ov12iko5fhpgdc@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:44:19 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:5bpr921hc46k98t30d82lv9rpjveiffdv5@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

Why? I'm not a politician I am not answerable to the
people, I'm answerable only to myself I needn't justify
any belief or conclusion I may make according to
evidence presented.

And just exactly where is this evidence?


 Everyone is free to study the events of 9/11

and study the ideas for and against the conspiracies
for themselves.

Unfortunately for you and people like you, many great minds
are starting to focus their attention on the 9/11 mass murder.
Justice will be served, regardless of the efforts of many
scoundrels whose agendas are simply to clog the internet with
disinformation. 

And the people who actually understand the facts are
free to laugh at you and mock you for your silly
ko0kspiracy beliefs, too.

The only people laughing at anything in this thread must think
that thousands of American civilians dieing is funny. You must
put yourself above your fellow citizens by calling the kooks?
Why don't you just go to hell Mr. Griffin, and burn alive like
many of the 9/11 victims did. 

They can if they like but they would be making fools of
themselves.

Not when you make laughable k'lames, such as your foolish
comparison of a B-25 Mitchell to a Boeing 767.

You obviously missed the point. The point was planes do hit
tall buildings and that was a quantifiable risk when the
WTC was built. Addmitedly the B25 that hit the Empire State
Building in 1945 was a lot smaller than a Boing 767,  But
that's totally irrelevent to the point that was being made.
But since you are being picky about it the B25 was capable
of carrying 3000 to 4000lb of bombs and there were larger
planes in service even in 1945.

SCREW 1945. Just another diversion. Who gives a fuck about
1945? Why does this B25 keep coming up? Give it up, man. Why
are you so fixated on this? Nobody should ever compare the WTC
with the Empire St. Building. No comparison and a complete
diversion.  A very weak attempt at a diversion. End of
subject. 

Problem
is apart from maybe some people high up in government or
people working in intelligence most of us don't actually
know all the facts pertaining to the event of 9/11 we
only know what we are told and can pick up in the media,
press and on the Internet, and can come to what ever
conclusion that seems plausible. This means no plausible
theory is any more valid than any other. And that of
course includes the official KoOkspiracy theory. LOL

The real kookspiracy is the official story, which has more
holes than any alternative suggested in this thread. If you
are blind to the obvious shortcomings of the afore mentioned,
your agenda is counterproductive to finding out the truth.
There were just too many people involved on 9/11 to pull off a
successful cover-up. Maybe they will all be prosecuted to the
fullest extent of international law. 

The predominent analysis is built on the available facts,
while the ko0kspiracy theories that you believe in are
built upon misunderstanding and/or ignoring those facts,
plus wild speculation without evidence.

The real kookspiracy is the official story, which has more
holes than any alternative suggested in this thread. If you
are blind to the obvious shortcomings of the afore mentioned,
your agenda is counterproductive to finding out the truth.
There were just too many people involved on 9/11 to pull off a
successful cover-up. Maybe they will all be prosecuted to the
fullest extent of international law. 

The fact that you cannot tell the difference puts you in
the same class as Biblical literalists who k'lame, because
their misunderstanding of scientific evidence and theory
blinds them, that the Earth is only thousands of years
old. 

The fact that you do nont want the truth revealed puts you in
the same class with murderers. Let's see..... kook or
murderer.  Tough decision... another debate for another time.

My advice would be; Don't believe anything.

Spoken like a true paranoid.

You can't always trust politicians

Where politics has any
involvement one can rest assured the liars, hypocrites
Scribes and Pharisees will distort the "truth" to
whatever end they choose.

Better that than ko0ks who disregard the facts if favor of
their paranoid ko0kspiracy theories.

What fact's?

The answer to that question, once it has been cleaned up,
would probably run to a few megabytes just to review what
you've said here, and I'm sure there are plenty that you
haven't ignored yet. 

Here's one for you:  Heat and temperature are not the same
thing. 

Knucklehead here read that, scratched his head for a while, and 
told himself "They are too!"  <snicker>

Good non-start, knucklehead.

Here's a corollary to that one: Softened steel will not carry
as much load as it did before the hardened steel absorbed
enough heat to soften it.  (Compare this, roughly, to male
anatomy if you like.)

Bullshit detector going crazy!!! There was no softened steel.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!  (Later, this idiot says I "ignored" 
melted steel.)  Knucklehead, it softens BEFORE it melts.  Before, 
as in "earlier"...as in "prior to melting," etc.  Let me know how 
much more dumbing-down it would take to get that through your 
clue repellers.  By the way, since you have some desperate need 
to portray yourself as a thinker, I'd like to hear your opinion 
as to any possible role decalescence might have played in the 
structural failure.  Just for the hell of it.

There is NOTHING you can post here to explain how fire in the
WTC softened ANY steel.  Pure conjecture that is just another
meaningless distraction. Burning jet fuel is hotter than a
forced air mixture of oxygen and acetylene too, I guess.

It's hilarious that you write that moronic snivelly nonsense so 
near where you saw the fact that temperature and heat are not the 
same thing.  It certainly puts your mind into perspective.  Maybe 
it will get all the normal people to talk down to you.  It 
certainly should.

Here's another: The airplane that hit one of the towers still
had over 100,000 pounds of fuel in its tanks when it hit.

Another distraction. It doesn't matter if there were a million
gallons of fuel. Is that the best you can do?

That's my best estimate of the amount of fuel, yes.  You already 
demonstrated that you don't know that the amount of heat 
available is related to the amount of fuel, so there's no point 
in trying to explain these fundamentals to you.  The fundamentals 
are clearly out of your mental grasp.

Want another?:  The Titanic carried more than 100,000 pounds
of fuel when it left port. Somewhere around 200 times that
much. 

And this is relevant how? You are reaching just a little
aren't you. What about the Nina, Pinta, and the Santa Maria?

Pay attention, airhead.  Obviously I had a reason for mentioning 
that.  Amanda, a featherbrain who's considerably brighter than 
you are, insisted that 100000 pounds of fuel would require a 
flying Titanic or something like that. 

By the way, fool, those ships you mentioned were powered by wind. 
I'm eager to hear you shriek that that's impossible.  Don't let 
me down, clown.

How do you like this one? If the towers had been imploded by
seeting off charges of any kind inside them, all of the
fucking windows would have been sucked inside before the
collapse.  (See the definition of implode if you don't
believe that.) 

This one is really tough. Let's see.. if you ignore the
pictures of melted steel.. and the fact that the firemen found
what they described as bombs.. your arguement might be valid.
Weak and insignificant. 

Halfwit, did you intend to comment on what I said?  You did?! 
Bombs?!     BWAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

There are more.  Thousands of them.

Bring it on Mr. Griifin. I prefer a thousand at a time.

Get used to this, chump:  You're just another manipulable 
knucklehead.  As for your wanting a thousand after your laughably 
stupid zero out of five performance...ROTMFFLMMFAO.