Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:16b0a256g5q23udpm8lvd3pqmlkome55gg@4ax.com,
The Kat <newskat@katxyzkave.net> typed:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:19:12 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

since you are being picky about it the B25 was capable of carrying
3000 to 4000lb of bombs and there were larger planes in service even
in 1945.

Irrelevant!  What it WAS carrying is the only thing you should
consider.

The B-25 weighed 28,000 loaded, and carried 692 gallons of fuel,
AND flew at about 200mph!

Not the SLIGHTEST BIT like a fully loaded 767.

The technical specifications were never particularly relevant to the point
in any case which was simply that aircraft do occasionally hit tall
buildings.

Nice backpedal, and of course the specifications are relevant.  Your
point was that if an airplane, any airplane, hits a building, it
shouldn't fall down -- thus the WTC towers had to be destroyed by
internal explosions.  With that argument shredded, you have nothing to
fall back on to prop up your kook conspiracy theory.

-- 
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
  as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
  -- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
  -- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
  -- Double-A on technology development