In news:260620062019503795%erfc@netcabal.com,
Art Deco <erfc@netcabal.com> typed:

Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:16b0a256g5q23udpm8lvd3pqmlkome55gg@4ax.com,
The Kat <newskat@katxyzkave.net> typed:

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:19:12 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

since you are being picky about it the B25 was capable of carrying
3000 to 4000lb of bombs and there were larger planes in service
even in 1945.

Irrelevant!  What it WAS carrying is the only thing you should
consider.

The B-25 weighed 28,000 loaded, and carried 692 gallons of fuel,
AND flew at about 200mph!

Not the SLIGHTEST BIT like a fully loaded 767.

The technical specifications were never particularly relevant to the
point in any case which was simply that aircraft do occasionally hit
tall buildings.

Nice backpedal, and of course the specifications are relevant.  Your
point was that if an airplane, any airplane, hits a building, it
shouldn't fall down -- thus the WTC towers had to be destroyed by
internal explosions.  With that argument shredded, you have nothing to
fall back on to prop up your kook conspiracy theory.

When the Empire State building was built if there were aeroplanes in
existence they were quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was hit by a
WWII Bomber could not have been foreseen. But at least it was tested with a
giant ape LOL
-- 
Amanda