| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: InvertedSloth |
| Date: 27/06/2006, 08:00 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
Your Name Here=Harvey wrote:
If it looks like an orange, and smells like an orange, then it must be one.
It's called the duck test: If it looks like a duck and it
walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it's a duck.
The events of September 11'th 2001 didn't look, walk, nor
quack like anything that had ever happened before.
The way the Towers fell, was just like a controlled demolition.
Strange, that...
Wrong. The fall of the Twin Towers didn't look anything like
controlled demolition. The fall of WTC7 did, but there is
audio from the scene proving that it did not sound like
controlled demolition. Controlled demolition, even on much
smaller buildings, takes weeks and months to set up; that
simply did not happen at the WTC. Controlled demolition is a
precise technique and has never dealt with planes crashing
into the building, nor fires, nor the buildings being
pommeled by debris from the fall of neighbors.
Incidentally, "Controlled Demolition" is the name of a
company, a family business located in Maryland, and of an
international consortium that the Maryland company leads. It
is not really a general term for demolishing a building with
explosives, but people use it that way because Controlled
Demolition, the company, dominates the field.
--
--Bryan