In news:g1v1a29vqhvsmv00tu3n63hg131mcl8i32@4ax.com,
The Kat <newskat@katxyzkave.net> typed:

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:10:35 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

The way the Towers fell, was just like a controlled demolition.

Bullshit.,  Anyone who has watched TV in the last 10 years
has seen MANY examples of controlled demolition, and the WTC
tower collapses looked NOTHING like controlled demolition,
STARTING with the fact that the collapsed FROM THE TOP!

Well WTC 1 an 2 appear to have collapsed from the top, the collapse doesn't
appear to have started from the bottom. A collapse from the bottom wouldn't
make sense in any case because they had been attempting to fight the fires
in which case one would logically assume any potential softening of the
steel beams caused by heat above should have been cooled by falling water
from the fire fighting effort and sprinkler systems. There are eye witness
reports from people who managed to escape that the sprinkler systems were in
operation and there was water cascading down the stairwells.

The fact that WTC7 does appear to have collapsed from the bottom and so soon
after the fire people withdrew is somewhat puzzling though, the lower floors
should have been water logged which should have cooled the steel framework.
-- 
Amanda