Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: Cardinal Chunder
Date: 28/06/2006, 19:37
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell

Justin Case wrote:
"Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
news:klir9254lup6r4qm8tec6gcl19s00b2g9v@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:44:36 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"

Proves nothing.  Which never stops the konspiracy ko0ks.  Ever heard
of Occam's Razor?


Occam's Razor is used to trim the fat off of scientific theories.

Bullshit. It is, to paraphrase, to favour the simpler explanation, all things being equal.

It would not be wise to use it in conjunction with a conspiracy because
most conspiracies have patsies and cover stories.

And apparently casts of thousands all prepared to murder in the most baroque convoluted and nonsensical series of events that only a kook could string together.

The cover story will be easier to believe than the complications of
the conspiracy. If you apply Occam's Razor you will always be duped
by the patsy. You will always fall for the cover story.

Complications such as? I ask merely because konspiracy kooks bleat a lot about the supposed flaws in the commonly accepted view of 9/11 but they're not so quick to emphatically state the alternative, complete with supporting evidence.

-- 
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."