In news:280620062006153149%erfc@netcabal.com,
Art Deco <erfc@netcabal.com> typed:

Anything developed after 1931 is totally irrelevant to the point in
any case.

You made no point and have no case.  By bringing up a B-25 hitting the
Empire State Building, you implicitly implied that the WTC towers
should have been able to survive the impact of a large, modern
jetliner loaded with fuel.  When this argument was shredded, you then
went off on this wood-and-canvas nonsense.

Well it was claimed they were constructed to withstand the impact of a
modern jetliner. The Boeing 747 which was designed in the mid to late 60s
came into commercial service in 1970. I understand The WTCs were not
completed until 4 years later 1974. The Boeing 747 is still the largest
Commercial jet liner in service but will be surpassed by the Airbus A380
which is due to enter service later this year. The Boeing 767 is a smaller
aircraft than the 747. In the light of subsequent events these claims were
obviously total BS.

However if you have done your homework you would know the Supermarine
S.6B developed by Reginald Mitchell won the Schneider Trophy for
Britain for the 3rd year in succession, was capable of 407.5 mph,
and was of course precursive of the Supermarine Spitfire and P51
Mustang. But in 1931 most aircraft weren't even in the same league
LOL

Completely irrelevant and non sequitur to your WTC conspiracy claims.

Well if people want to copy bits of their Ladybird book aviation history.It
might be worth copying stuff that actually has some significance. LOL
-- 
Amanda