Justin Case wrote:

"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:e7upn90b1o@news2.newsguy.com...

Justin Case wrote:

"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:e7ui9301t9i@news3.newsguy.com...

Justin Case wrote:

"Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
news:klir9254lup6r4qm8tec6gcl19s00b2g9v@4ax.com...

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:44:36 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
Proves nothing.  Which never stops the konspiracy ko0ks.  Ever heard
of Occam's Razor?

Occam's Razor is used to trim the fat off of scientific theories.

Bullshit. It is, to paraphrase, to favour the simpler explanation, all
things being equal.

Surrrrrrrre it is kookman,

The most useful statement of the principle for scientists is,

"when you have two competing theories which make exactly the same
predictions, the one that is simpler is the better."

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/occam.html

Congratulations for confirming what I said you dolt.

It also confirms what I said. You are just a troll.

No it doesn't you ignorant fucking cretin. Occam's Razor has nothing to do with "trimming the fat off of scientific theories".

Concerning 911, all things are not equal.
Nice try though

You're right they're not equal. Konspiracy kooks (that's you) don't have
a single shred of evidence to back up your wild fantasies. You don't
even state with specificity what your wild fantasies even.

You like to label people don't you ?
I look at the facts, about 911 the facts point to conspiracy.
Only a credulous fool would believe the 'official' explaination
that has so many holes in it that it sank faster than the titanic.
Only a credulous fool would continue to defend it.

And what is the conspiracy? I've asked you repeatedly for details and as yet you have not even said. Please explain what actually happened.

I bet you believe Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin.
Why not ? The official explaination said so.

Non sequitor. 9/11 could have been a conspiracy and JFK not, or vice versa, or both could have been or both could have not been. JFK is utterly irrelevant to this thread in other words.

It would not be wise to use it in conjunction with a conspiracy

because

most conspiracies have patsies and cover stories.

And apparently casts of thousands all prepared to murder in the most
baroque convoluted and nonsensical series of events that only a kook
could string together.

Your kookiness is showing. What cast of thousands ?

The cast of thousands required for any of the stupid alternative
explanations that kooks allude to without providing details.

It would not require a 'cast of thousands ' to have orchestrated 911.
Why do you assume it must ?

Well you tell me your alternative theory and why it doesn't require a cast of thousands. All of the kooky theories I've heard thus far that allude to explosives in the building, remote controlled planes, dancing Mossad agents, painted military jets etc. do require a cast of thousands at all levels of government in the US and even abroad. They even require complicity by investigators, firemen, police and large numbers of eye witnesses.

If your theory is different, let's hear it. I've asked you repeatedly to provide one and yet you won't. Why is that I wonder?