Bryan Olson wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

houlepn@attglobal.net wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

This was misquoted as I never posted such a statement and is another
lame attempt to discredit me. For future reference I don't use the *
symbol as a modifier, or to place emphasis on a word in a given
sentence. I do find it most interesting that you chose this misquoted
material to question whether or not I am a human.

I see no quotation of you there. You seem to know English,
so what are you talking about?  Do you need a lesson in how
quotations are marked?


--
--Bryan

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

I  was not responding to you Bryan. The above was used in a context
which implied that I made the statement. The poster went on to falsely
lambaste me using the misquotation as a foundation from which to launch
another in a series of personal attacks. Such "mistakes" are
commonplace on usenet these days when the subject of 9/11 is involved.
I applaud your efforts to defend the original story by whatever means
necessary. The status quo is, for the moment, being maintained on
meaningless platforms such as usenet. Even when the perpetrators of
9/11 are eventually tried and convicted, I don't expect the overall
tone of threads such as this one will change one iota. Yours is a
shining example of the network of misinformation that exists on the
internet with the sole purpose of clouding the facts surrounding 9/11
with whatever "BS of the day" you are advertising to garnish the
heaping helping of propaganda being served. I think I'll pass.