BornN2BS wrote:

Bryan Olson wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

houlepn@attglobal.net wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

This was misquoted as I never posted such a statement and is another
lame attempt to discredit me. For future reference I don't use the *
symbol as a modifier, or to place emphasis on a word in a given
sentence. I do find it most interesting that you chose this misquoted
material to question whether or not I am a human.

>>

I see no quotation of you there. You seem to know English,
so what are you talking about?  Do you need a lesson in how
quotations are marked?


--
--Bryan

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

I  was not responding to you Bryan.

Yes, we know. You can tell by the headers. So? If you don't
want to be in a public discussion, then Usenet is the wrong
medium for you.

> The above was used in a context

which implied that I made the statement.

And you said he misquoted you, yet there was no quote in
the material you cited.

> The poster went on to falsely

lambaste me using the misquotation as a foundation from which to launch
another in a series of personal attacks. Such "mistakes" are
commonplace on usenet these days when the subject of 9/11 is involved.

No, you pretended something was presented as quote, when it was
not.

I applaud your efforts to defend the original story by whatever means
necessary.

Methods like telling the truth.