Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated

BornN2BS wrote:

Many posts turned up that are authored by people
who still are regular contributors to Usenet. You
might want to contact them to compare their recollections
of the events or inquire if their posts in the Google archive
might also have been tampered with.


Oh sure. The most easily questionable thing here is my memory. At least
I have one. Quite the contrary for me, my memory is the only thing that
is NOT questionable, and you sir can't change that.


I can't force you to be more self critical than you are but you
shouldn't expect *others* to put more weight on *your* memory
of past events than they do on their own memories consistently
with presently accessible objective evidence.

The internet has
since been scraped clean of MANY things related to 9/11.


Such as?

If you google
for many key words related to 9/11 you will find that somehow amazingly
things have disappeared.


I noticed that conspiracy sites have proliferated like crazy.
So much so that it is increasingly difficult to find official accounts
of events.

You are no different than the rest and your
opinion likewise means nothing to me.


I respect that. That is why I make my best to stick to easily
checkable facts and rational arguments.

I watched 9/11 unfold. I witnessed for myself as the WTC was said to be
safe after the first "attack". I saw for myself as newscasters
summonsed stock traders who worked in the WTC to report for work, many
of whom I might add, took the bait and perished on that day. I will not
forget.


Nobody question that early reports were conflicting and confused.
This was to be expected absent a conspiracy to coordinate them.

But you claim evidence that information was suppressed. You claim
that no report was made of a commercial airliner and that there
was much discussion of a Cessna theory on CNN after the first
tower hit and before the second one. But Google searches of
Usenet posts from 9/11/2001 are consistent with published CNN
transcripts of the coverage. Before the second plane hit, Murtagh
reported that he had seen a jet, possibly a 737 hit the WTC.

Then some people all over the world, in the USA, in Russia,
in Germany, in Italy, etc. started posting on Usenet that they
heard the news, (before the second hit was reported) that a 737
or something like it hit the WTC.

For instance:

***
Nochmal ich:

aus alt.disasters.aviation:

CNN is reporting what was possibly a 737 has crashed into one of the
World
Trade Center Towers at about the 80th floor. They are showing live Pics

currently. What a mess per live TV

Scheint wohl was ernstes zu sein. Ich hoffe es gibt nicht zu viele
Opfer!!!

Tsch��
David "David" <david.obr...@t-online.de>
***
Subject: HOLY FUCK!

A fucking commercial jetliner (possibly a 737) hit the World Trade
Center.

There's a huge fucking hole and it's burning like a mofo.

--
Alan Mundy
***

Now, if these archived posts were planted, what about the numerous
people all over the world who replied and quoted them in their replies?
Many must still have copies of their posts in their "Sent Items" boxes.
Has any discrepancy between Google Group's archive (formerly Deja
News) and  poster's locally archived messages ever surfaced?