Bryan Olson wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

Bryan Olson wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

houlepn@attglobal.net wrote:

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

This was misquoted as I never posted such a statement and is another
lame attempt to discredit me. For future reference I don't use the *
symbol as a modifier, or to place emphasis on a word in a given
sentence. I do find it most interesting that you chose this misquoted
material to question whether or not I am a human.

 >>

I see no quotation of you there. You seem to know English,
so what are you talking about?  Do you need a lesson in how
quotations are marked?


--
--Bryan

BornN2BS wrote:

Why do you think that the WTC fires *must* have been much
cooler that typical residential fires are?

I  was not responding to you Bryan.

Yes, we know. You can tell by the headers. So? If you don't
want to be in a public discussion, then Usenet is the wrong
medium for you.

 > The above was used in a context

which implied that I made the statement.

And you said he misquoted you, yet there was no quote in
the material you cited.

 > The poster went on to falsely

lambaste me using the misquotation as a foundation from which to launch
another in a series of personal attacks. Such "mistakes" are
commonplace on usenet these days when the subject of 9/11 is involved.

No, you pretended something was presented as quote, when it was
not.

I applaud your efforts to defend the original story by whatever means
necessary.

Methods like telling the truth.

After seeing all that squink thrown about there is only one possibility
Methinks the kook protests to much