"Bryan Olson" <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:d8Mog.30694$VE1.532@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...

Justin Case wrote:

It is you that is full of shite. If you want to argue about what %

murdoch

owns,
it is a moot point.

If *you* think the percentage he owns is a moot point, *you*
should not have claimed:

|  Just Google "Ruppert Murdock", but you won't, because YOU
|  won't listen to reason. He controls 90% of the media, that is
|  a fact. Check it out. I bet you won't bother to check.
See message: <A8ing.10841$6d1.2981@trndny09>

[...]

Take a look at a piece of the Murdock empire, it looks like 90% to me.

That's absolutely idiotic. Obviously anyone can find more than
10% that he does not control.

What the Murdoch machine spews out is picked up by the other mainstream
news outlets. He does not have to own them to control them, idiot.
But you knew that didn't you ?

You don't seem to have a grasp on the real world.

Utter bullshit, but thanks for playing anyways.

Of course we
knew who Rupert Murdoch is, and we knew your 90% claim to be
nonsense. You acted all "that is a fact" and bet people wouldn't
bother to check. In fact, you were wrong and obviously had not
bothered to check your own facts.

Yes I have, Millions of dollars have been spent by the Bush admin on 'fake'
news broadcasts. The same garbage Murdoch spews filters down to most 'all'
mainstream media. That is how they 'control' 90% of the media.

I have seen your type idiot bunkerism way to often.
A credible source could warn of a blue comet that was going to hit earth,
and you
would be one of the idiots screaming it was all a lie and utter bullshit
since the comet is
green and not blue. Bunk away, idiot.