| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 30/06/2006, 03:48 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
In news:mre8a25qk31bq9bmrk33nrp3ugdb0h0mun@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:36:30 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:
In news:VrUog.690$ZV2.546@fe04.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:
Your statement: " When the Empire State building was
built if there were aeroplanes
in existence they were
quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was
hit by a WWII Bomber could
not have been foreseen. But at least it
was tested with a giant ape
LOL"
You made this statement ". . .quite primitive biplanes.
. ." Yet I show you that it is a totally false
statement along with other false statement you have
made about WTC conspiracies. You totally ignore any
facts and continue to believe what you THINK might be
facts.
Most of the aircraft in existance and in regular service before 1931
(apart from alien flying saucers perhaps) were primative even
compared to a B25 and you have not been able to show otherwise.
Oh, Christ! Another saucerhead. That would explain a lot!
There's considerably more evidence of alien flying saucers than there is of
Jesus Christ. :)
--
Amanda