In article <Oh0pg.74456$uP.37166@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>, manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:mre8a25qk31bq9bmrk33nrp3ugdb0h0mun@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:36:30 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:

In news:VrUog.690$ZV2.546@fe04.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Your statement:  " When the Empire State building was
built if there were aeroplanes
                             in existence they were
quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was
                            hit by a WWII Bomber could
not have been foreseen. But at least it
                            was tested with a giant ape
LOL"

You made this statement ". . .quite primitive biplanes.
. ."  Yet I show you that it is a totally false
statement along with other false statement you have
made about WTC conspiracies. You totally ignore any
facts and continue to believe what you THINK might be
facts.

Most of the aircraft in existance and in regular service before 1931
(apart from alien flying saucers perhaps) were primative even
compared to a B25 and you have not been able to show otherwise.

Oh, Christ! Another saucerhead. That would explain a lot!

There's considerably more evidence of alien flying saucers than there is of
Jesus Christ. :)
-- 
Amanda

If you want to read up about the 'Jesus' story, I think the most
accurate account is probably the 'Talmud Jmmanuel' material.
www.tjresearch.info/tjheresy.htm

See Ed T Martin's "King of Travellers - Jesus Lost Years in India" book.

This version of events, says that Jesus was not called Jesus in his time,
but that Christianity coined 'Jesus' after the events took place, and
made up some of it. ie. The resurrection did not take place, and Judas the
apostle did not betray Jesus, that was another man, also named Judas.
That Jesus was called Jmmanuel, instead.

If you wish to read the TJ text, I have it available here...
http://plain2.tripod.com/tj.txt

Harvey