| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Art Deco |
| Date: 01/07/2006, 02:36 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:
In news:fmcba25ckk27d498jhqb60mv4a3412me3u@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:58:34 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:
In news:aZdpg.285$wP7.215@fe06.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:
Amanda you should give it up. You get more ridiculous
with every post. You think you know things but you
don't know squat.
Then you are obviosly delusional.
No, he was quite correct; you far overvalue your limited expertise,
and make a habit of rejecting superior analysis and outright factual
information for the sole reason that it interferes with your belief
system.
As I have said before I don't have a belief system. You are trying to debunk
something that doesn't exist. Which simply indicates a blind acceptance of
official dogma and no facility for independent thought and a fear of
intellectual analysis. Which is sad in a way, but thankfully not my problem.
Liar and hypocrite. You made a running series of kooky claims about
the WTC towers, all of which were shown to be silly, yet you refused to
consider the truth.
Dissection time:
As I have said before I don't have a belief system.
Yet you'll believe any nonsense that comes down the pipe, so long as it
isn't "mainstream".
You are trying to debunk something that doesn't exist.
This is either a lie, or you are completely delusional. The only
things that were debunked were your silly claims about steel, aircraft,
etc.
Which simply indicates a blind acceptance of official dogma
As the preceding statement is nonsense, so is this one. What "official
dogma" are you talking about? Strength of materials, especially steel?
Which is a science, BTW, a subject you are obviously not well
acquainted with.
and no facility for independent thought and a fear of
intellectual analysis.
Blatant hypocrisy. You refused to consider that your materials claims
and aircraft straw men were absurd.
--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer
"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity
"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development