In article <300620061914043567%erfc@netcabal.com>, erfc@netcabal.com says...

Your Name Here=Harvey <you@somehost.somedomain.aus> wrote:

In article <Oh0pg.74456$uP.37166@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>,
manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:mre8a25qk31bq9bmrk33nrp3ugdb0h0mun@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:36:30 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:

In news:VrUog.690$ZV2.546@fe04.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Your statement:  " When the Empire State building was
built if there were aeroplanes
                             in existence they were
quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was
                            hit by a WWII Bomber could
not have been foreseen. But at least it
                            was tested with a giant ape
LOL"

You made this statement ". . .quite primitive biplanes.
. ."  Yet I show you that it is a totally false
statement along with other false statement you have
made about WTC conspiracies. You totally ignore any
facts and continue to believe what you THINK might be
facts.

Most of the aircraft in existance and in regular service before 1931
(apart from alien flying saucers perhaps) were primative even
compared to a B25 and you have not been able to show otherwise.

Oh, Christ! Another saucerhead. That would explain a lot!

There's considerably more evidence of alien flying saucers than there is of
Jesus Christ. :)
-- 
Amanda

If you want to read up about the 'Jesus' story, I think the most
accurate account is probably the 'Talmud Jmmanuel' material.
www.tjresearch.info/tjheresy.htm

See Ed T Martin's "King of Travellers - Jesus Lost Years in India" book.

This version of events, says that Jesus was not called Jesus in his time,
but that Christianity coined 'Jesus' after the events took place, and
made up some of it. ie. The resurrection did not take place, and Judas the
apostle did not betray Jesus, that was another man, also named Judas.
That Jesus was called Jmmanuel, instead.

If you wish to read the TJ text, I have it available here...
http://plain2.tripod.com/tj.txt

Harvey

Is there any form of GOBBLE that you don't believe in?

It's all the matter of doing your own research and follow up.

Or do you really take seriously what is popular opinion, and that
which is 'generally' gobbled up by the masses?
That which is basically cannon fodder - which when you take seriously,
is not what it appears to be.

The information itself, is the key, as to whether it is genuine or
not. Whether it makes sense and ties in all the elements together.

Religions do not give us the 'truth' the story of the actual events,
because they have become political, and manufactured their own myths
to support their version of events.
Sounds familiar? Governments do this also, as with the retelling of
9-11. Everything about 9-11 has too many inconsistancies, that reveal
that the events could not have taken place, as in the official story.
Even the date itself, seems to be a play on numbers and words - that it
is not what it seemed to be.

And so who do you gobble up? Do you really believe G W Bush is one
who tells a truthful story? He plays to his own political agenda (and
personal interest) - the safety of the American people is the last thing
on his mind. He is not for world peace and harmony, he only puts on the
fascade that he is... And probably why the US is so hated these days -
it's all a lie...

Harvey