| Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated |
| From: Bookman |
| Date: 01/07/2006, 03:51 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks |
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:35:30 +0000 (UTC), you@somehost.somedomain.aus
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
In article <300620061914043567%erfc@netcabal.com>, erfc@netcabal.com says...
Your Name Here=Harvey <you@somehost.somedomain.aus> wrote:
In article <Oh0pg.74456$uP.37166@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>,
manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...
In news:mre8a25qk31bq9bmrk33nrp3ugdb0h0mun@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:36:30 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
wrote:
In news:VrUog.690$ZV2.546@fe04.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:
Your statement: " When the Empire State building was
built if there were aeroplanes
in existence they were
quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was
hit by a WWII Bomber could
not have been foreseen. But at least it
was tested with a giant ape
LOL"
You made this statement ". . .quite primitive biplanes.
. ." Yet I show you that it is a totally false
statement along with other false statement you have
made about WTC conspiracies. You totally ignore any
facts and continue to believe what you THINK might be
facts.
Most of the aircraft in existance and in regular service before 1931
(apart from alien flying saucers perhaps) were primative even
compared to a B25 and you have not been able to show otherwise.
Oh, Christ! Another saucerhead. That would explain a lot!
There's considerably more evidence of alien flying saucers than there is of
Jesus Christ. :)
--
Amanda
If you want to read up about the 'Jesus' story, I think the most
accurate account is probably the 'Talmud Jmmanuel' material.
www.tjresearch.info/tjheresy.htm
See Ed T Martin's "King of Travellers - Jesus Lost Years in India" book.
This version of events, says that Jesus was not called Jesus in his time,
but that Christianity coined 'Jesus' after the events took place, and
made up some of it. ie. The resurrection did not take place, and Judas the
apostle did not betray Jesus, that was another man, also named Judas.
That Jesus was called Jmmanuel, instead.
If you wish to read the TJ text, I have it available here...
http://plain2.tripod.com/tj.txt
Harvey
Is there any form of GOBBLE that you don't believe in?
It's all the matter of doing your own research and follow up.
We'll[tinw] take that as a "yes".
<Snip additional gobble, unread>
ESL!
--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
COOSN-266-06-89425
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.
WWFSMD?