Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: John Griffin
Date: 01/07/2006, 15:00
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

you@somehost.somedomain.aus (Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:

In article <300620061914043567%erfc@netcabal.com>,
erfc@netcabal.com says... 

Your Name Here=Harvey <you@somehost.somedomain.aus> wrote:

In article <Oh0pg.74456$uP.37166@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>,
manic_mandy@hotmail.com says...

In news:mre8a25qk31bq9bmrk33nrp3ugdb0h0mun@4ax.com,
Widdershins <sinistre@liripipe.com> typed:
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:36:30 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow
Pencil, and wrote:

In news:VrUog.690$ZV2.546@fe04.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:



Your statement:  " When the Empire State building was
built if there were aeroplanes
                             in existence they were
quite primitive biplanes so the fact it was
                            hit by a WWII Bomber could
not have been foreseen. But at least it
                            was tested with a giant ape
LOL"

You made this statement ". . .quite primitive biplanes.
. ."  Yet I show you that it is a totally false
statement along with other false statement you have
made about WTC conspiracies. You totally ignore any
facts and continue to believe what you THINK might be
facts.

Most of the aircraft in existance and in regular service
before 1931 (apart from alien flying saucers perhaps)
were primative even compared to a B25 and you have not
been able to show otherwise. 

Oh, Christ! Another saucerhead. That would explain a lot!

There's considerably more evidence of alien flying saucers
than there is of Jesus Christ. :)
-- 
Amanda



If you want to read up about the 'Jesus' story, I think the
most accurate account is probably the 'Talmud Jmmanuel'
material. www.tjresearch.info/tjheresy.htm

See Ed T Martin's "King of Travellers - Jesus Lost Years in
India" book. 

This version of events, says that Jesus was not called Jesus
in his time, but that Christianity coined 'Jesus' after the
events took place, and made up some of it. ie. The
resurrection did not take place, and Judas the apostle did
not betray Jesus, that was another man, also named Judas. 
That Jesus was called Jmmanuel, instead.

If you wish to read the TJ text, I have it available here...
http://plain2.tripod.com/tj.txt

Harvey

Is there any form of GOBBLE that you don't believe in?


It's all the matter of doing your own research and follow up.

I'm glad you made that hilariously ironic remark just before 
parroting the shallowest versions of some of the standard 
retarded remarks.  After all, illiterate clowns like you are 
provided only for normal peoples' entertainment.

Your "research" is something like "An airplane loaded with tens 
of thousands of pounds of jet fuel crashed into those 
buildings...I wonder why they collapsed.  Bombs! Yeah, that's it! 
George Bush did it! Yeah!"  Fool.

Or do you really take seriously what is popular opinion, and
that which is 'generally' gobbled up by the masses?
That which is basically cannon fodder - which when you take
seriously, is not what it appears to be.

Give us illustrations and especially, explain why you can see 
"the truth" while "the masses" examine all available information 
and conclude that the obvious facts are the answer.

The information itself, is the key, as to whether it is
genuine or not. Whether it makes sense and ties in all the
elements together. 

Religions do not give us the 'truth' the story of the actual
events, because they have become political, and manufactured
their own myths to support their version of events.
Sounds familiar? Governments do this also, as with the
retelling of 9-11. Everything about 9-11 has too many
inconsistancies, that reveal that the events could not have
taken place, as in the official story. Even the date itself,
seems to be a play on numbers and words - that it is not what
it seemed to be. 

Good grief...a certifiable moron momentarily snaps out of his 
congenital stupor and spews idiocy.

And so who do you gobble up? Do you really believe G W Bush is
one who tells a truthful story? He plays to his own political
agenda (and personal interest) - the safety of the American
people is the last thing on his mind. He is not for world
peace and harmony, he only puts on the fascade that he is...
And probably why the US is so hated these days - it's all a
lie... 

Harvey

Illiterate fool, it would be funny as hell to see you try to 
discuss in detail any of the shit you parroted here.