In news:Xns97F34EB95CBAthathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:fmcba25ckk27d498jhqb60mv4a3412me3u@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:58:34 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:aZdpg.285$wP7.215@fe06.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Amanda you should give it up.  You get more ridiculous
with every post.  You think you know things but you
don't know squat.

Then you are obviosly delusional.

No, he was quite correct; you far overvalue your limited
expertise, and make a habit of rejecting superior analysis
and outright factual information for the sole reason that it
interferes with your belief system.

As I have said before I don't have a belief system. You are
trying to debunk something that doesn't exist. Which simply
indicates a blind acceptance of official dogma and no facility
for independent thought and a fear of intellectual analysis.
Which is sad in a way, but thankfully not my problem.

It is spectacularly obvious that it is in fact your problem.

You're recycling the shallowest versions of long-since
discredited nonsense.  You make vague references to scientific
and engineering concepts, erroneously believing that they support
you, while others give you specific results derived from
familiarity with those principles.  For just one little example,
you were blown away by the very idea of an airplane carrying 100
thousand pounds of fuel. You actually thought it would take an
oceangoing ship to carry that much, which wouldn't even be a good
puddle in its bunkers. That was a definitive display of ignorance
and it puts all the rest of your yapping into perspective.

Idiot
-- 
Amanda