Bimbo "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:Xns97F34EB95CBAthathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:fmcba25ckk27d498jhqb60mv4a3412me3u@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:58:34 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:aZdpg.285$wP7.215@fe06.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Amanda you should give it up.  You get more ridiculous
with every post.  You think you know things but you
don't know squat.

Then you are obviosly delusional.

No, he was quite correct; you far overvalue your limited
expertise, and make a habit of rejecting superior analysis
and outright factual information for the sole reason that
it interferes with your belief system.

As I have said before I don't have a belief system. You are
trying to debunk something that doesn't exist. Which simply
indicates a blind acceptance of official dogma and no
facility for independent thought and a fear of intellectual
analysis. Which is sad in a way, but thankfully not my
problem. 

It is spectacularly obvious that it is in fact your problem.

You're recycling the shallowest versions of long-since
discredited nonsense.  You make vague references to
scientific and engineering concepts, erroneously believing
that they support you, while others give you specific results
derived from familiarity with those principles.  For just one
little example, you were blown away by the very idea of an
airplane carrying 100 thousand pounds of fuel. You actually
thought it would take an oceangoing ship to carry that much,
which wouldn't even be a good puddle in its bunkers. That was
a definitive display of ignorance and it puts all the rest of
your yapping into perspective. 

Idiot

Translation: waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
<snicker>

By inadvertently posting a one-word autobiography instead of 
answering, you tacitly agree that you couldn't begin to refute 
what I said.