On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:05:20 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 21:57:09 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 21:36:37 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:42:40 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 08:21:25 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:25:04 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:52:10 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:50:24 GMT, www.peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us>
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:14:16 GMT, Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote:

Lack

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

of 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

proof 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

to 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

support 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

your

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

k'lame 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

noted

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

.  

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

Hi

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

, 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

P

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

l

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

a

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

g

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

i

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

r

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

i

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

s

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

m

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

A

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

l

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

e

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

x

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

a

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

! 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

E

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

S

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

L

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

! 

Message-ID: <un89a2ta6jts5qf2ejbrilm81d8vaiom79@4ax.com>

Alexa's continued admission that she cannot prove her k'lame is noted.

You're known for your amazingly stupid false assumptions, booger.

It's not a false assumtion, Alexa.  You cannot prove your k'lame.
QED.  

your alexa lames aren't proof that your assumption is true.

Calling you by your name isn't lame, Alexa.  It is polite.  

nope. it's stupid because you've called hundreds of different people alexa

You've got hundreds of voices in your head, Alexa?  It must be that,
because in all the time I've known you, you haven't used "hundreds" of
identities.  

You're making a fool of yourself.  Post the message ID where I stated my
real-life identity.

It is not an assuption at all, by the way.  The fact is that you
cannot prove your k'lame.  HTH.

you're either psychotic and retarded

No, I am correct - which drieves you nuts.  Well, more nuts, anyway.  

ESL!