On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 03:50:09 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:Xns97F45E76CCA97thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

Bimbo "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:Xns97F34EB95CBAthathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:fmcba25ckk27d498jhqb60mv4a3412me3u@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:58:34 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:aZdpg.285$wP7.215@fe06.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Amanda you should give it up.  You get more ridiculous
with every post.  You think you know things but you
don't know squat.

Then you are obviosly delusional.

No, he was quite correct; you far overvalue your limited
expertise, and make a habit of rejecting superior analysis
and outright factual information for the sole reason that
it interferes with your belief system.

As I have said before I don't have a belief system. You are
trying to debunk something that doesn't exist. Which simply
indicates a blind acceptance of official dogma and no
facility for independent thought and a fear of intellectual
analysis. Which is sad in a way, but thankfully not my
problem.

It is spectacularly obvious that it is in fact your problem.

You're recycling the shallowest versions of long-since
discredited nonsense.  You make vague references to
scientific and engineering concepts, erroneously believing
that they support you, while others give you specific results
derived from familiarity with those principles.  For just one
little example, you were blown away by the very idea of an
airplane carrying 100 thousand pounds of fuel. You actually
thought it would take an oceangoing ship to carry that much,
which wouldn't even be a good puddle in its bunkers. That was
a definitive display of ignorance and it puts all the rest of
your yapping into perspective.

Idiot

Translation:

I don't give a damn what you believe in regard to 9/11 you can debunk as
much as you like. But any idiot can debunk it's not particularly clever or
cool it just sad. I don't know why I wasted my time here to be honest.

It's obvious, given the holes in your story: You are here to attempt
to advance a plausible falsehood of the events of 9-11 as a member of
a conspiracy dedicated to undermining GWB as a first step to
infiltrating and seizing power in the U.S.A.  This is obvious because
the society is so secret and powerful that their existence cannot be
proven, but only inferred by the actions of its members.  It is also
obvious that such a powerful conspiracy was the guilty party of the
9-11 attack, which was clearly engineered in order to frame Bush with,
as a part of said conspiracy.  

The discontinuities in your "story", such as the disinformation in the
form of a "plausible", but utterly non-factual comparison of a B-25
Mitchell to a Boeing 767, reveal your purpose.  

Like it?  That's _exactly_ what ko0kspiracy "theorists" do.  They
never, _ever_ provide positive evidence of the "conspiracies" that
they imagine.  It's all focussed on misinformation, disinformation,
and downright fictions.  The ko0k s who k'lame that a jetliner didn't
hit the Pentagon always focus on the tiny minority of witnesses who
say that what they saw wasn't a jetliner - they utterly ignore the
vast majority who _did_ see it, because it doesn't fit their
pre-conceived fantasies.  And that is the sort that you are.  You
don't "study", rather you pick out the few things that you believe you
understand, and throw away the mountain of evidence that doesn't fit
your beliefs.  

Stay out of the science fields, cupcake, you are utterly unsuited for
it.  

ESL! 

-- 
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B 
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) 
Clue-Bat Wrangler 
Keeper of the Nickname Lists 
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order 
Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
COOSN-266-06-89425

"I'd love to kill you in a ring"  - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely 

"****SPV.......  So yes I am an idiot." 

"ASK THE NWS,  YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes

Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or
rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich.  In other words, you're
communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of
Hitler.
- Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead.

WWFSMD?