"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:Xns97F45E76CCA97thathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

Bimbo "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:Xns97F34EB95CBAthathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> typed:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:fmcba25ckk27d498jhqb60mv4a3412me3u@4ax.com,
Bookman <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> typed:

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:58:34 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:aZdpg.285$wP7.215@fe06.lga,
H. Bosch <hbosch@charter.net> typed:

Amanda you should give it up.  You get more ridiculous
with every post.  You think you know things but you
don't know squat.

Then you are obviosly delusional.

No, he was quite correct; you far overvalue your limited
expertise, and make a habit of rejecting superior
analysis and outright factual information for the sole
reason that it interferes with your belief system.

As I have said before I don't have a belief system. You
are trying to debunk something that doesn't exist. Which
simply indicates a blind acceptance of official dogma and
no facility for independent thought and a fear of
intellectual analysis. Which is sad in a way, but
thankfully not my problem.

It is spectacularly obvious that it is in fact your
problem. 

You're recycling the shallowest versions of long-since
discredited nonsense.  You make vague references to
scientific and engineering concepts, erroneously believing
that they support you, while others give you specific
results derived from familiarity with those principles. 
For just one little example, you were blown away by the
very idea of an airplane carrying 100 thousand pounds of
fuel. You actually thought it would take an oceangoing ship
to carry that much, which wouldn't even be a good puddle in
its bunkers. That was a definitive display of ignorance and
it puts all the rest of your yapping into perspective.

Idiot

Translation:

I don't give a damn what you believe in regard to 9/11 you can
debunk as much as you like. But any idiot can debunk it's not
particularly clever or cool it just sad. I don't know why I
wasted my time here to be honest. 

You didn't waste your time here to be honest.  You wasted your 
time here to be stupid.

Is there any chance that you're going to show us what you're 
calling "the official story" and give us some comments that 
actually address it?  No.  Everything you've said here has been 
superficial, uninformed nonsense.  Don't take that personally; it 
was just nature taking one of its regular courses. Someone 
invents a dumb story, and someone else reads it and repeats it.  
It was superficial uninformed nonsense before you parroted it. 
After a few more generations it will have become genuine wacko 
lore.

By the way, I don't believe anything until I see some reasonable 
argument in favor of it, and I don't swallow attempts to 
discredit it that are bland, predictable, nonsensical and just 
plain stupid. Since opposites supposedly attract, you should love 
me for that.