Subject: Re: Do we all agree that 9/11 was an inside job//Debunkers ARE implicated
From: John Griffin
Date: 03/07/2006, 18:25
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

In news:pesha2pvhiei32qt27pc3nqgqsistuv6kd@4ax.com,
The Kat <newskat@katxyzkave.net> typed:
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 03:50:09 GMT, "Amanda Angelika"
<manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

I don't give a damn what you believe in regard to 9/11 you
can debunk as much as you like. But any idiot can debunk

If it was THAT easy, YOU would be the debunker.

It's very easy to make out people are mad or mentally
deficient. One doesn't require any great proof or evidence to
debunk something at variance with an official or majority
view, because it can be assumed to be an accepted "Fact"

You've provided a steady stream of evidence that you have at 
least two mental deficiences.  The first one is your obvious 
ignorance.  Worse than that is your inability to understand 
simple, obvious facts. Even worse is your inability to correlate 
the shit you believe in lieu of facts and arrive at anything 
resembling a rational inference even within that nonsense.  Your 
worst problem is your apparent determination to cling to those 
dysfunctions at all costs.

Problem is just because people accept things as fact doesn't
actually make those things true. The truth is the truth it
isn't democratic and overrides all political manipulation. The
truth is perfect and like a raging fire consumes all who
oppose it. 

That horseshit was even more stupid than the first part.