"The Kat" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:o8bja2h9sg6kcf34tgueej2lutv4r6u7d0@4ax.com...

On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:21:52 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

maybe the smartest thing to
do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the
building collapse. "

I've said this OVER AND FUCKING OVER...

Yeah, like a stuck broken record.

'pull' is NOT THE TRIGGER PHRASE USED IN A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION,
you fucking asshole!

YOU are the only one going on and on about this 'Trigger phrase'. To 'pull'
a building means
to demolish it.

You  can't show me a SINGLE CASE where anyone in the demolition
industry says it is, or has ever been such.

It is used all the time, nutcase. Not your stupid 'trigger phrase' strawman.
To 'pull' a building in construction lingo means demolition.

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling
me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and
I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to
do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the
building collapse. "

Silverstein is not in the demolition business. Maybe he is not familiar with
your
idiotic 'trigger phrase' strawman. It is plain to see by anyone who has any
reading comprehension
what he was saying.

I guess Silverstein is one of your idiots

No, but YOU certainly are.

Wrong again

Truth: The WTC towers collapsed from the top down.

Are you implying it would be impossible to reverse the firing order ?

The weight of a building being demolished is used as part of the

demolition.

That ISN'T going to work if you START at the top!

Sure it would, are you mentally challenged ?