Art Wholeflaffer wrote:

Cardinal Chunder wrote:

Art Wholeflaffer wrote:

Cardinal Chunder wrote:

Art Wholeflaffer wrote:

I was reviewing my postings on 9-11-01 and have found out that I not
only exposed 9/11 that day as an inside job (which is sooo obvious) but
I also correctly blamed the Debunkers are the main culprits.
They alone would've put the nano-thermite/mini-nuke in WTC 1, 2 and 7;

Nano thermite / mini nuke !!! Hahahahahah!

My oh my, has debunking fallen that low...well, yes.

Ha-Ha-Ha-ha to you Bub, supporting the traitors, but sadly
that is all too typical :<

So you're going to provide any evidence to support the notion that such
things as nano-thermite & mini-nukes exist in any form let alone that
required to bring down these buildings without leaving any trace of
themselves?

No? Well then.

Anthrax being some kind of non sequitor you just tossed in.

No, straight from Ft. Dietrick,  which kinds of shoots down all of your
other stupid and implausable explanations!

It's a non-sequitor, as was your response.

WTC-7, and you say fires, that's not even a credible
reply, unless your a complete idiot.

Actually it is a credible reply, unless you are claiming the firemen
(who had just lost friends and colleagues) were lying about the massive
structural damage and heavy fires on multiple floors. Or that the
pictures of WTC7 showing thick smoke belching from one whole side of the
building were fabricated.

It's credible ONLY and I repeat ONLY if you are trying to cover-up
something

No, it's credible because it conforms to what any person unencumbered with paranoia might expect to happen to a heavily damaged building that has been on fire for hours.

No explosives are required at any stage of the process. No evidence of explosives even exists.

like how everything was pulverized and this was the only time in world
history
that steel buildings - 3 of them - totally collapsed - as in -

Two buildings were hit by planes. WTC7 was so badly damaged and burning out of control that it came down by itself. It's not hard to comprehend.

as the
owner
readily admitted on TV - controlled demolition style.

No he didn't. What he said was open to interpretation.

One interpretation being that he asked the firefighters to pull from the building when it was clear that it was lost, an interpretation subsequently clarified and validated by eye witness accounts and video footage.

The other being that he, the government, the firechief, the firefighters, and the demolition crews had rigged the building and blew it up (even though it was being gutted by fire) as part of the baroque and totally implausible konspiracy that kooks desperately want to believe happened that day and for which they offer no evidence.

Hmm, tough choice.

Which means, as the proof has it, the explosives were planted weeks
before,

Which explosives would those be then? Do you have any credible evidence to support your assertion? Any evidence at all?

I ask merely because like most konspiracy kooks you're quick to nitpick at tiny inconsistencies, similes or turns of phrase but not so quick to provide a plausible alternative explanation backed up by evidence.

as the elevators were closed down and the teams were sent it.

???

I hate to see how the debunkers are supporting the home-grown
terrorists, but it sure isn't the first time, and I'm afraid it won't
be the
last time.

That would be the "home-grown terrorists" for which you haven't supplied the slightest shred of credible evidence to support your assertions.

Curious how the anthrax was sent to the then 2-opponents of the
(sic) Patriot Act, and the photographer that shot the pix of
the 2 Bush drunken kids.

Again with the non-sequitors.

Is that what you are claiming?

My only claim is that your debunking has reached new lows.

If you don't like people laughing at you, quit repeating the same kooky whack-a-mole assertions.

10.  Controlled Demolition "Implosions" Require Skill

And months and months of constant drilling, cutting, laying of detonation cords, planting of tonnes of explosive etc. All of which is extremely obvious. Obvious to the people who work there, obvious to visitors, obvious to cops, obvious to firemen, obvious to forensic examiners, obvious to cleanup crews.

Yet your mystery conspirators managed to wire an entire building and detonate without a single person realising it was done. Oh wait, the konspiracy kooks realised it because they're so clever after all, and can see past things like contrary evidence and common sense!

Those firefighters who evaluated the building and then evacuated the vicinity sure must have felt foolish for thinking that it was going to collapse due to the raging fire burning for hours or the huge 20 storey gouge up one side.