<houlepn@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1152151990.730418.78680@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

Justin Case wrote:

"Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
news:p6ija2lslev5avqni4p243ur31j378l2bp@4ax.com...

On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:21:52 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> wrote:

"Bookman" <thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
news:ektia2pvg2k2k595c6jdmc4f60ioa0vg7b@4ax.com...

Truth: Controlled demolitions are performed from the bottom up.

Most of the time they are, like in WTC7

Non sequitur.

You wish it was, run away from the fact that squibs are plainly visable
going off up the side
of wtc7.

It is also clear that those "squibs" appear after the initiation of the
collapse when the top of the building has begun to sag considerably.
When floors fall on one another, must not the compressed air between
then exit somewhere?

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.h
tm

Compressed air should have blown out windows a bit more randomly, don't you think ?
Not in a straight line, plus if it was just compressed air wouldn't it go from the top down
not the bottom up ? Your compressed air assumption doesn't work for explaining what
happened.