"Widdershins" <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote in message
news:7ahta2tm5pi7acdqj3o242om3vja0qkel5@4ax.com...

Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:28:00 GMT, "Justin Case"
<NoFuckin'Way@UgottaBkidding.net> licked the point of a #2 Yellow
Pencil, and wrote:

"Widdershins" <sinistre@liripipe.com> wrote in message

You wish it was, run away from the fact that squibs are plainly visable
going off up the side
of wtc7.

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.h

404.

want to try another?

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm

word wrap cut off the 'tm' that would have made the link work.
You could not figure out that simple little detail  ?

Word wrap is for the sender to adjust. Couldn't you figure out how?

Yes I did, didn't know I had to until the link was broken.

The so-called squibs are puffs of solid materials being ejected by
the air pressure differential generated by the falling floors above.

Proof please. You will notice on wtc7 the 'puffs' go from the bottom up,
whereas in wtc1+2 they go from the top down.

If you look closely enough, you can also see (relatively) small
particles of material falling ahead of where the "squibs" are
supposedly exploding.

If you look closely at WTC1 + 2 you see the tops mushroom into a cloud
of pulverized concret that put 3 inches of dust miles around the wtc.

You see what you want, in your pictures to support whatever
fairytale you want to believe.

I did not 'want' to see anything in those videos.
I find the whole thing 'very' disturbing.

Hardly convincing.

Yes, the official story is.