In news:44cb9b3b$0$12181$dbd49001@news.wanadoo.nl,
dre <v> typed:

But both populist mainstream science, philosophy and religion has an
irrational belief that we are either the centre of the universe or
the centre of creation.

huh?

science believes this?
get real...

Scienific theories are based on philosopy and that's just another way of
saying religion.

This largely assumes we are alone, and largely
rules out

the possibility of ET life let alone ET intelligence and visitation.

ofcourse not,science isn't ruling out the
possibilty of extraterrestrials,only visiting
aliens is not very likely.
i know for sure somewhere aliens excist but this
doesn't mean they are visiting us.

But it doesn't mean they aren't.

But if one interprets evidence with such a blinkered view, then one
is going to be blind to the evidence that already exists and ones
mind closed to the possible truth it may hold.

Evidence doesn't have to be 100% conclusive to form a valid
scientific theory. One can draw a conclusion on the weight of
evidence alone. Since there is no real rational evidence we are
alone in the universe (the theory is based on the absence of
evidence, and is totally irrational by definition LOL) then one
can't rule out any possibility that the actual evidence suggests.
The truth really is out there :)

so maybe they excist and thus they are visiting us...?
hardly scientific...no wonder serious scientists
keep away from believers.

There are plenty of scientific theories based on incomplete knowledge. You
don't need 100% evidence or full and complete knowledge to form a viable
working scientific theory.
-- 
Amanda