| Subject: Re: Roswell - It Really Happened. by Jesse Marcel |
| From: "Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 02/08/2006, 03:46 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
In news:44cf057e$0$27896$dbd4d001@news.wanadoo.nl,
dre <v> typed:
Amanda Angelika schreef:
In news:44ce4532$0$81550$dbd43001@news.wanadoo.nl,
dre <v> typed:
found a cellphone in the pyramids?
Why would ETs be using primitive Cellphones?
ANY other piece of alien techonlogy found?
I would doubt it, not only would it be thousands if years old and
probably disintegrated by now.
lol...bodies don't dissapear but alien technology
desintegrate...how convenient...
Bit like American Cars LOL. But I dare say Green Aliens make sure there
technology is fully bio-degradable :)
I would be surprised if archaeologists would
recognise
it even if they found it.
ofcourse they would see it doesn't belong to
egyptians.
Not necessarily. The more advanced technology becomes the less visible it is
Besides why would advanced ETs need vast amounts
of overt technology? One would think most of the technology would be
implanted in their bodies, so they wouldn't need radios, computers,
or even digital watches.
any implants found by ANYONE ?
Why would they be recognisable as such? The Victorian Archeologists who dug
most of the mummies up wouldn't have recognised a battery let alone a
microchip LOL
That said there have been instances of advanced technology found out
of place, but generally if things don't fit in with accepted beliefs
about the past the information tends to either be ignored, covered
up or relegated to the fringe media. Tabloids etc. So it's hard to
say for certain. People wouldn't believe it in any case.
and you hang on to this to explain away the
non-evidence..
Well part of the problem is archaeology can only interpret the past in the
light of prevailing contemporary knowledge and will also tend to interpret
things according to contemporary opinions and pre-conceptions. Sometimes it
takes time for evidence the be interpreted and for things to come to light.
Actually there was a report a bit back about a microchip found
inside the Skull of Ivan the Terrible. But since that's exactly the
sort of thing one might read in a tabloid. How reliable is that
information? It's hard to say. There's a lot of disinformation and
nonesense about and there are liars. But some of the stories could
be true who knows?
santa is real too..you see him every year...
Well Saint Nicholas was a real saint, and Catholics belive saints go to
heaven, and you see pictures of santa every year, so there is some truth in
that statement :)
The Pyramids are a good example of that, the fact that anyone can
check them out on Google Earth and see for themselves that they
have perfect alignment
from space?
you use google to see the perfect alignment?
hahaha...that's like using a car to paint a picture.
What makes you think Google Maps are that inaccurate? I would think they
would have to be extremly accurate since they are used with Global
positioning systems.
they are not perfectly aligned..
They appear very close to perfect on both Google Earth and the
Satelite image in Google Maps,
exactly!
APPEAR!
and if they are out it's in the order of
fractions of
degrees.
not perfectly,as kooks think and want them ....
The Magnetic Poles are not static in any case, if they are accurate to 1
degree that's accurate enough.
Of course given their age one would expect wind
and sand errosion
to have fractionally changed their alignment in anycase. It should
also be noted that the Google Salelite images are a mosaic of images
and are not always taken from a perfectly verticle angle.
forget google!
it isn't a science tool!
only pretty pictures...
There's no reason to suspect it's inaccurate.
This is important when
consideing the Pyramids because if a pyramid is not photographed from
directly above IOW on the "ground" and view axis, this will cause
perpective distortion. However one can assertain the angle of view
by looking at other buildings in the same image, particularly modern
houses and office buildings which are of course rectangular and
roughly of known height. Using trigonometry one could work out the
exact angle of view and distance the satelite is from the ground,
but I don't think this is necessary to give a rough idea of how
accurate they are, as long as one has a basic understanding of
perpective one can suffer vertigo from the comfort of your own
livingroom LOL :)
well got there and make the calculations..you make
the assumption you proof it.
Why? I'm not trying to educate anyone, convert people or prove anything. I
don't care what people believe. All I am saying is the pyramids do seem to
be very accurately aligned and people can check it out for themselves.
i don't believe in ghosts...you do...
if a company told you they can take you to the
stars you would believe them..
who's naiev...
AFAIK I've never seen a ghost, or a UFO, neither have I ever been to
the USA. But I have no reason to doubt people's experiences. The
evidence doesn't have to be 100% conclusive. I believe the USA
exists and that there is a World outside the UK although before I
visited Germany in 1983 I wasn't certain, and considered the
possibility the World was some sort of conspiracy invented by the
BBC and the British Government. LOL
using any medication?
I sometimes need to take headache pills because I spend too long staring at
my computer screen and recently had to use Earex to clear some ear wax which
was causing mild tinitus, but apart from that I don't take anything legal,
and rarely take anything illegal. Perhaps I should? :)
--
Amanda