Amanda Angelika schreef:

In news:c199d2p8qh87b7jdtn12jeccvfvciqmvu4@4ax.com,
http://peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us> typed:

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 08:14:37 +0000 (UTC), "Harvey@NZ" <kiwilove@co.nz>
wrote:

"Amanda Angelika" <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6sHAg.1536$XQ.226@newsfe7-win.ntli.net:

In news:qk0rc2lthsatjcea33f7f6tc0m2hltmr53@4ax.com,
http://peaceinspace.com <truth@r.us> typed:

I have seen on the History Channell a show about flying disks
built by US.

Yesh the AVRO, and it flew for a few feet and crashed.

Not sure the AVRO air car would qualify as an American built craft.
It was made in Canada and AFAIK AVRO was a British owned company,
AVRO are best known for the Lancaster and later the Vulcan bomber
which were some what more successful :)

There is an aspect about the Avro project, not generally known about.
In that, in the Nick Cook book "The Hunt for Zero Point"
which deals with Nazi Super secret weapons and technology,
Anti-gravity, the US Aerospace industry and history, and
Zero Point Energy --- it mentions that the Avro Air Car seems to have
just been a cover, <snip>

Cover?  Cover for what?  Oh yeah!  The Super Duper Top Seekrit space
shuttle.

And the fact that the US aerospace industry is now begging the
Russians and paying 12,000,000 per ride to the Spaze Station 'cause
Lockhed's shuttle is so advanced it can't make it that far.

In case you're wondering, Super Duper Top Seekrit clearance is higher
than Cosmic Magestic 12 Umbra White House Ultra.  That's because
they're hiding the fact that there isn't a US Space Industry.

Ask any NASA employee.

It does sometimes seem ridiculous the levels they must be going to cover
things up. Like I've never understood why NASA use rockets to launch the
shuttle, when surely they could piggy back a shuttle on a conventional
aerocraft (as was the concept for the European Hotol project) or use an
airship or balloons to lift it aloft.

how big is this balloon?
thie size of texas?


 Using a high altitude release would

enable the shuttle to dive a couple of thousand feet before firing rockets
once at an upward trajectory this would give enourmous added momentum and
totally  dispense with the need to tie it to a bomb full

of highly explosive

fuel

your rockets don't need fuel?

and mean the craft used to lift it to high altitude would be completely

reusable. It's like as if they go out of their way to make it difficult,
more costly not to mention more dangerous than it really needs to be.

the russians do it,chinese,europeans,japanese,india.....they must have a damn good reason why they do it like that and not your method...