Art Wholeflaffer schreef:

dre wrote:

Art Wholeflaffer wrote:

All you do is validate my thesis that debunkers are rightfully
dismissed as fools, charlatans and clinically insane!

only asking for credible proof

Again, it has been proven to those capable of understanding the proof.
For obvious reasons, that eliminates debunkers and useful idiots, so
you can never be told, which is a good thing.  I have to admit that I
totally agree with the policy that slobs like you should never be told,
it is way beyond your ability to understand the facts about the larger
reality. 

blabla,this the proof you can't  deliver on your own beliefs,religious fanatics behave the same way,ranting about the enemy who want to destroy them ,making acusations they are being followed and kept silent...the net has millions of pages about the ufo religion.
but still governments want to silence you...hahaha...

but do you really think you are so important?

are they afraid you will show the  proof about aliens?
pffff,don't flatter yourself.
they laugh their socks off....
anyway ,we are not worthy so not to worry...

So keep spewing your nonsense about hedgehogs and crash-test

dummies, they are funny to the general public.  Weather balloons
anyone!!  Ha-ha;

Being a Debunker means never having to say you're sorry, or even making
a lick of sense!
Sage advice by John F. Schuessler

Debunkers: I have heard it said that the most frustrating and least
useful aspect of ufology is the machinations of the debunkers.
Debunkers are experts at the use of disinformation, misinformation, and
propaganda. They provide prosaic explanations for everything.

over and over again ufo's turn out to bee just normal happenings,the ufo's over the coast of mexico were oil platforms, ufo landing spots were fungy rings...claimed by an idiot that ufo's landed there and he found high level of radiation,wich was not true.
and more and more,the list continues...
but it's forbidden to investigate this,if one does he is automaticly a debunker.
no matter if he's right or wrong.
fanatics i call them,and you also.
hiding the truth is for you second nature,god forbid a debunker is right...


If the

first story gets challenged, they simply generate another story and do
not even apologize for changing their position. No information or data
supplied by the ufologist is ever good enough for them.

ofcourse it will,HARD evidence,i've seen myself the way people react to something strange in the sky,they look at it for 2 seconds and shout :
look a ufo!


Truth, honesty,

ethics and things like that are foreign to their way of operating
because it might erode their position. They seldom do real
investigations.

Most of their explanations are canned and used over and over so that
they do not feel it necessary to do investigations. All this is very
frustrating to the ufologists that conduct extensive investigations,
record every little detail of a UFO incident, assemble statistics,
maintain vast databases, and probably most of all, respect the good and
honest witnesses who report their UFO incidents.

those eyewitnesses are the primary bases of all the "data" collected.
not an alien computer or saucer or even a radio transmission picked up by seti..
but ofcourse seti is suspect because nothing is found yet...typical...
soooo,recapping...people with limited rational are your source and conviction of aliens visiting us...
oh, wanna buy my perp. mobilee?
it works great!
you can sell it with big profits because it works you see...
don't need proof i guess,i am a trusty eyewitness...

well flasher or whatever...i keep watching for aliens and your rantings about the debunkers,
i think it's priceless.
keep repeating each other on the net and copy and paste till your old and grey.
never lose the faith!
they are in there!
uhhm, your skull i mean,
lots of room for it.