Subject: HELP WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!//Pays Big $$$ (just ask O-BORG!)
From: "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com>
Date: 24/09/2006, 05:22
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.abduct

WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!

To those concerned:

Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.

All we have really asked for is someone who is just a little bit
coherent
enough to make a  sound counter-argument. Somebody who understands
what an alien implant is, what a crop-impression is, how
downed extraterrestrial craft have been back-engineered for 55 years
and
somebody who has a working knowledge of the alien phenomenon.
Perhaps somebody who has interviewed multiple witnesses of
extraterrestrial crafts and has done some of their own investigations.


We only have asked for someone who is not strung-out
on "swamp gas" or has a serious relation with a
"time compressed crash-test dummy!"  Why can't debunkers
intelligently discuss crop circles with telling us how they have
"crapped" in circles, or discuss alien abductions
without dee-bunkers discussing how their brains
have been abducted.  Why oh why do they always have
to make "copy-cat" posts like Wanted: Credible
UFO Believers when it is obvious that the study of
the  extraterrestrial presence is NOT a belief system
but based on a massive amount of scientific evidence.

All we have left on these alien newsgroups are
total nincompoops, complete imbeciles, uninteresting liars,
low-level spOOks and delusional paranoids.

So please-please send us some credible UFO debunkers,
and occasionally rotate the low-level spOOks (Echelon);
crack-pots (Davis, Shipley); delinquents (George, Chumpest);
half-wits (Wilson, Patrick) and buffoons (Twit, ASF-Wipe)
for some person with an IQ above 5!

Is that too much to ask?  WELL IS IT??
- - - - - -
The Star Man added this:

I'm of the mind that we should not even waste time with ANY debunkers.

They obviously have an agenda that is counter to that of ufologists.
Part of this agenda is to keep us busy arguing with them.

I contend that we ignore such feeble attempts to sway us from our goal
which should be to disseminate the truth and what little evidence we
have amongst the general populace. In doing this, we allow the people
who want to know to have the evidence, these people will in return
spread the information even further telling more and more people. The
people who do not want to know will forget about it. The people who
don't want anyone to know will tie us up in circular arguments and
useless prattle about the invalidity of our work. Ignore them or you
do their work for them.

Stark alien
- - - - -
Jos X expounded:

I don't think there is a sensible debate possible on the aliens because
1. Science has long since decided it will debunk this issue.
   Going back to an open-ended debate will involve admitting by science
   it has emotionally jumped to conclusions for over half a century.

2. The general population isn't confronted with UFO's or aliens or
   crop-circles or abductions or whatever on a daily basis. The
population
   at large has no motivation to be interested, and you could say they
are
   right, and that more pressing matters exist, there hasn't been a
mass
   landing so.... Saying "they don't exist" can be interpreted as "they

   don't exist in my life"... "so I ignore them for the time being if
you
   don't mind".

3. The evidence is not conclusive enough to be indisputable. After the
   debunking-campaign, the level of evidence needed is also much higher
   than for any other matter: for instance, retrieving an alien body,
   or retrieving an live UFO isn't going to be enough anymore, because
   everyone will ignore it as a hoax.

So, until we have a mass landing, or aliens staying on the planet on
TV for a serious amount of time (perhaps years), and many people are
meeting
them openly over a multiple meetings, the general population is not
going
to believe they exist (i think).

4. There is the matter of emotionally not being able to get to grips
with
   the reality of aliens. Complicating matters are that they are more
   advanced (possibly), and that humanity is apparently not the
pinnacle
   of evolution all of a sudden. Additionally, there is fear of losing
   the planet if these aliens are superior in technology, and perhaps
   there is even fear of losing the power to manipulate fellow humans
   when these aliens turn out to be telepathic (among criminal and
   scam-oriented people) maybe(?).
   Then there is the matter of racial hatred among humanity, which
   possibly will be projected unto aliens as well (it is different,
   it must be bad), also not very inviting for aliens.

When will the truth be known?  Beats me, but not tomorrow I'd say.

Jos