Subject: Re: HELP WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!//Pays Big $$$ (just ask O-BORG!)
From: Matt Giwer
Date: 24/09/2006, 06:53
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.abduct

http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:33:34 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:
WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!
To those concerned:
Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.

    Do what rational people do. Put the burden of evidence upon those who make the claims. There is nothing to "debunk" without physical evidence.

Okay, there's an ET saucer at S-4, Groom Lake.  The only way you can debunk
that is to let everyone into the facility to see for themselves.

    An unsupported claim of a saucer is an unsupported claim. The person making the claim has to produce physical evidence in support of his claim.

-- 
Israel: A land filled with panic-stricked cockroaches in fear for their
existence.
    -- The Iron Webmaster, 3685

 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
 Iraqi democracy http://www.giwersworld.org/911/armless.phtml a3