"http://www.infowars.com/" <truth@r.us> wrote in message 
news:r08ch21etc3eb6rp721lgksolk6pft2vu3@4ax.com...

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:53:46 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:33:34 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:

WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!
To those concerned:
Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.

Do what rational people do. Put the burden of evidence upon those who 
make the
claims. There is nothing to "debunk" without physical evidence.

Okay, there's an ET saucer at S-4, Groom Lake.  The only way you can 
debunk
that is to let everyone into the facility to see for themselves.

An unsupported claim of a saucer is an unsupported claim.

You have no proof that the claim is unsupported, idiot.

The person making the
claim has to produce physical evidence in support of his claim.

Already did, idiot.

Go see for yourself.

Unfortunately, even if a flying saucer is produced this would not prove that 
it had anything to do with aliens. It could be human built. The only way to 
prove aliens are here is to show us an alien.