http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:53:46 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:33:34 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:

WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!
To those concerned:
Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.

    Do what rational people do. Put the burden of evidence upon those who make the claims. There is nothing to "debunk" without physical evidence.

Okay, there's an ET saucer at S-4, Groom Lake.  The only way you can debunk
that is to let everyone into the facility to see for themselves.

    An unsupported claim of a saucer is an unsupported claim.

You have no proof that the claim is unsupported, idiot.

    I know for a fact no physical evidence has been produced.

    No one has any obligation to take the claims of every raving idiot seriously.

The person making the claim has to produce physical evidence in support of his claim.

Already did, idiot.

    Produce the physical evidence for us all to see.

Go see for yourself.

    I haven't been invited.

    Until you produce physical evidence to support your assertion you remain in the raving idiot category.