Infowars, I really appreciate your replies, but take heed: debunkers
must NEVER be shown the proof. EVER!!  First off, the very fact that
they must address the proof could prove fatal to even the most credible
(if there is such a beast) debunker.  Also, time has shown that
debunkers CANNOT and thus SHOULD NOT ever be shown or even told any of
the truth.  Their feeble minds would simply snap.  There are far too
many debunkers who have committed suicide, have gone insane or simply
have gone totally apoplectic.

Perhaps in the FAR FUTURE debunkers can be brought around to the truth
of higher
intelligences but I would bet against it.

Let us try not to lead them on because they are not mature enough to
understand what the
rest of us do.  Would you try to explain to a bunch of first graders
the laws of thermodynamic?
Would we expect a 7-year old to write a thesis on physics?  No we
wouldn't.  Dealing with debunkers is akin to dealing with a retarded
4-year old.

So know you should see that debunkers are "sub-human" to be treated no
better than slugs or a turd floating down a stream.  Most debunkers are
clinically insane and need of massive pshyco-therapy.

Please don't misunderstand this post, I am the debunkers best friend
and I am only trying to help them.  But first they must turn themselves
into the proper authorities and forward a list of their supporters,
sympathizers, funders and enablers.



http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:53:46 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:33:34 GMT, Matt Giwer
<jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:

Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. wrote:

WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!
To those concerned:
Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.

	Do what rational people do. Put the burden of evidence upon those who make the
claims. There is nothing to "debunk" without physical evidence.

Okay, there's an ET saucer at S-4, Groom Lake.  The only way you can debunk
that is to let everyone into the facility to see for themselves.

	An unsupported claim of a saucer is an unsupported claim.

You have no proof that the claim is unsupported, idiot.

The person making the
claim has to produce physical evidence in support of his claim.

Already did, idiot.

Go see for yourself.